Decision in process after under review springer


  •  

Decision in process after under review springer

1. Shared decision-making is recommended to align the treatment plan with the patient’s preferences and values. The Editor may invite more reviewers, returning the submission to 'Under Review' status, or may begin to enter a decision and move the status to 'Decision in Process'. This study identified resilience measurement parameters that can be used to formulate resilience quantification and improvement strategies of a transportation system. Maybe because "Decision in progess" is described on Elsevier's support website as: "The final Handling Editor in a journal with split decision and author notification tasks has submitted a decision but the Administrative Editor has not yet notified the author". Decision in Progress: the editor has made a decision and the manuscript decision is being processed in the journal office. Revisions are usually requested to take account of criticism and comments made by referees. 3d 1183, 1186 (10th Cir. You may be asking: Who sees the manuscript after I submit it? changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that “ reviewers invited” “under review” “review complete” “decision pending,” and others. Having a plan is the first step, but then there are seven after that, so consider this the set up. of this journal and other of our journals published under the Springer Science + Again, this choice is made by the author online after acceptance”. The actual in-depth review of your file is conducted by graduate faculty, usually an admissions committee headed by the Director of Graduate Studies. In daily clinical practice, however, SDM is not fully integrated yet. 7 decision-making process steps Though there are many slight variations of the decision-making framework floating around on the Internet, in business textbooks, and in leadership presentations, professionals most commonly use these The company that receives an offer to merge from another, larger one, will never receive such an offer again if it accepts. 3/manuscript), of which 40. The deep breathing exercises can address the ego depletion that occurs in intense encounters. Peer review service. Reference (Moreno-Munoz et al. On Dec. 2 Mr. The decision on whether to proceed to peer review in such cases is at the Editor's discretion. Every decision-making process produces a final choice, which may or may not prompt action. For example, if the participant accepts, he or she may receive 2 yuan while the proposer receives 8 yuan. In this paper we discuss the results of a recent feasibility study and pilot trial for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse Our study aims to contrast the neural temporal features of early stage of decision making in the context of risk and ambiguity. You can find out which peer review system is used by a particular journal in the journal's 'About' page. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of diurnal cortisol profile on decision making under risk in individuals with problem gambling and a healthy control group. The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) has been incentivizing peer reviewers by providing CME credit for conducting reviews. Mistake 3 Failing to Adequately Document the Process. It is not at all uncommon for litigation to occur several years after committee meetings in the peer review process were held. Organisations create opportunities and conditions for career extension via their personnel instruments. The company won’t do business in China, for instance. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. 217 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) Usage 46,446 Downloads 3 Altmetric Mentions Peter’s extensive business experience has been gained after securing his B Comm (Hons) degree from the University of Birmingham and an MBA from Manchester Business School. Physicians’ decisional conflict decreases during the decision-making process for an advanced cancer SP, though it remains at a high level. 482 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 0. These opinions are available as Adobe Acrobat PDF documents. 61 The scheme is intended to provide a review process that does not require victims to commence judicial review proceedings in court. 7 Steps for an Effective Decision-Making Process. The science of judgment and decision making involves three interrelated forms of research: analysis of the decisions people face, description of their natural responses, and interventions meant to help them do better. 3 days after submission. Appeal Under Review A medical decision has been made and we are working to process your decision. Based on existing data, it This article examines work-related factors and their impact on the retirement decision-making process. , the rational unified process and various forms of the Vee and spiral models); and (3) primarily Multi criteria decision making techniques In generic terms in common decision making processes follow eight steps for decision making process [9; 10], which are presented in Fig1. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is required within 1 month. Oroantral communication (OAC) acts as a pathological pathway for bacteria and can cause infection of the antrum, which further Springer, and Inderscience. "Decision in process" means the editor has made a recommendation   When Associate Editor or Handling Editor recommends his decision to Editor ( Status: Ready for Decision/With Editor) This is the whole story of Elsevier Review Process. 2016-2019) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of Biodiversity management requires effective decision making at various stages. 2016). Filed under the common header of opportunity , three separate findings represented opportunity, while findings related to codes of ethics (17) and rewards and sanctions (15) were categorized here as well. These new amenities provide the conditions, both in terms of their inherent utility and new work opportunities, to continuously attract a flow of people and allow the economy to expand. Increasing antibiotic resistance poses a significant threat to the effectiveness of current antibiotic therapies. Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer or it is currently under review at another journal (submitting the same paper to After you have read the decision letter and the reviewers comments, wait for  Motivation: Quite long but constructive review process. This offers great potential for synergy between AI systems and the human intellect already delivering care. We searched Medline (1950–2008) 34 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only 28 days to first decision for all manuscripts 52 days from submission to acceptance 16 days from acceptance to publication. After a successful pilot, Springer Nature has taken the early decision to roll out In Review, its new author submission service, across the BMC series journals. . Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Citation Impact 2018 1. However decision making in the real world is complex, driven by multiple factors and involves a range of stakeholders. Jun 20, 2019 · Although peer reviewers play a key role in the manuscript review process, their roles and tasks are poorly defined. Please note that there are hundreds of other journals in different fields of research. Little is known about older patients’ experiences with shared decision-making on dialysis or CC. The Journal of Headache and Pain is a peer-reviewed open access journal specifically dedicated to researchers involved in all aspects of headache and related pain syndromes, including epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials and real-world data. 3. Kley. After you have written your article and prepared your graphics, you can submit your article for review. After children enter the child welfare system, subsequent out-of-home placement decisions and their impact on children’s well-being are complex and under-researched. Proper identification can help slow down the process. Using a step-by-step decision-making process can help you make more deliberate, thoughtful decisions by organizing relevant information and defining alternatives. 368 - 5-year Impact Factor 0. And are manuscripts ever revised by the authors after review, and re-reviewed? The process is obviously somewhat different at this journal, so it may not be strictly  29 Apr 2020 Account, Submission, Review, Decision, Revision, Proofing, After Publication For more information on when to expect a decision from the editor or what the status via email from the production team regarding the publication process. Initiatives to improve the implementation of SDM would be helpful. The development review process includes the following main steps. A sample of 230 Dec 14, 2018 · Certain ramifications of the decision are explored in the cases discussed. In this before-and-after study, participants comprised substitute decision makers for You can read more about the peer-review process here. Despite its increasing implementation worldwide, it remains uncertain why the effect of CDS varies and which factors make CDS more effective. Decision publishes articles on all areas related to judgment and decision-making research including probabilistic inference, prediction, evaluation, choice, decisions under risk or uncertainty, and economic games. Victims can still apply to a judge for review if they are dissatisfied with the CPS decision after an internal review. 5. Step 4: After the game, the participant is rewarded with candy or other gifts. The entire decision‐making process is dependent upon the right information being available to the right people at the right times. By pre-caching the business data of requesting vehicles to edge cloud networks and oncoming vehicles, requesting The National Assembly of Bulgaria affixed to a historical decision in the first session of 2012. After 9/11, an addition was made: “solidarity with the free values of the United States of America. The first part of the book examines the organizational decision making process, describing the often-contentious environment in which important environmental health Biotechnology for Biofuels has a new subtitle: 'Advancing biological production of fuels, chemicals, and biomaterials'. , 2016 ) analysis the emerging trends and challenges in the new era of using social media through mobile apps to improve their customer engagement and load forecast. Audit paper status has been changed from under review to reviewers assigned. Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. I did take about 6 months. Nov 06, 2018 · You can learn a decision-making process that allows you to quickly assess the best choice and make it based on data that supports the objectives and goals you’ve been tasked to achieve. The use of participatory techniques in the field of transport is coming to the forefront recently. But the motion raises jurisdictional issues that we would examine in any event. I’m afraid I have no idea what the outcome will be, but I suggest you consider this experience in your thoughts about where to submit future papers. Mar 28, 2019 · A quarter of a century of research has shown that breathing in fine airborne particles emitted by cars, power plants and other sources shortens people’s lifespans. My previous article was with Taylor and Francis. 1016/j. As discussed in the System Life Cycle Process Drivers and Choices article, these models fall into three major categories: (1) primarily pre-specified and sequential processes; (2) primarily evolutionary and concurrent processes (e. The decision process does not exceed 6 s. Required Reviews Completed: the referee has completed the review of the manuscript and a notification has automatically been sent to the editor handling the paper. This much needed help should be embraced, if proven effective. BIOB aims at providing an international academic platform for exchanging views on and promoting research to support bioresource development, processing and utilization in a sustainable manner. The peer-review and subsequent first decision after review may take time depending on the However, if your paper was "With editor" and then "Decision in process" without "Under review," it might be a situation that, the AE does not think your paper is not enough qualified to be reviewed. Computerised clinical decision support (CDS) can potentially better inform decisions, and it can help with the management of information overload. This surge in immigration was part and parcel of a broader process of economic globalization that unfolded in the late 20 th century. g. 0. It is a peer-reviewed journal under the govern of China Association for Science and Technology (CAST) and sponsored by Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (CMES). The authors of an infamous 1976 assessment of the American Space Shuttle program, Dmitry Okhotsimsky and Yuri Sikharulidze, were mathematicians, not intelligence analysts. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice is an interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed journal on extensive livestock production systems throughout the world. Accepted papers were published on average 99. These calls for papers are issued after a special issue proposal has been accepted by the journal. Additionally, we were under a time constraint due to the numerous loan rules that challenge borrowers today. ejor. Reviewed articles were classified and Considering this process through the lens of policy analysis evidences that after a long time of non-decisions, a focusing event (i. Requests made during the review process or after acceptance will not be considered. Because operational research is mainly an applied science, high-quality case studies are prominent in the articles published by the journal. Citation Impact 1. Citation Impact 5. The chapter concludes with a discussion of Hatch-Waxman safe harbor, which is applicable to biologics/biosimilars and unchanged under the Act, and inter partes review, which will continue to play a significant role in biosimilars’ attempts to avoid district court Jul 16, 2019 · Many older patients approaching end-stage kidney disease have to decide whether to go for dialysis or non-dialytic conservative care (CC). Basically, if a contentious problem isn't binary, don't take a binary vote. 8 days. A range of evidence informs decision-making on innovation in health care, including formal research findings, local data and professional opinion. Share your preprint and track your manuscript’s review progress with our In Review service. Pastoralists rely on rangelands and livestock for their livelihoods, but exhibit different levels of mobility and market involvement, and operate under a variety of different land tenure regimes. Aug 13, 2018 · A hidden mode Markov decision process model is developed in (Li & Jayaweera, 2015) to the forecast the customers’ real-time behavior. 4 million to 172. I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal on October 1,2017. Many can recite the principles by heart. Overall, this sets up a dynamic process in which entrepreneurs respond to the flow of people with injections of money and investments into new businesses. To overcome these 68 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only 62 days to first decision for all manuscripts 118 days from submission to acceptance 21 days from acceptance to publication Citation Impact 1. This scoping review explored the roles and tasks of peer reviewers of biomedical journals. This study examined two placement decision-making models: a multidisciplinary team approach, and a decision support algorithm using a standardized assessment. The aim of this review was to assess the availability and effectiveness of tools supporting SDM in metastatic breast cancer care May 11, 2018 · Shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of metastatic breast cancer care is associated with positive patient outcomes. 27. Key external issues related to current service delivery such as the provision and timing of FP information, and lack of referral from oncology to the fertility clinic. After a decade of intense debate about mechanisms, there is still no consensus characterization. I've got a paper that has been in "Decision in Process" for 3 weeks. Decision in Process. l won at the recon stage and then went straight into quality review. BJIT - BVICAM’s International Journal of Information Technology having ISSN 0973 – 5658, being published by BVICAM, New Delhi, since last 08 years, is now being published quarterly (March, June, September & December) by Springer (The world’s largest publisher of scientific documents) w. B. An article may be rejected before peer review if it is outside the scope of the journal. However, cultural and organisational factors often prevent the translation of evidence for innovations into practice. The journal is an Open Access journal since This review provides a comprehensive review of the various applications of artificial neural networks in health care organizational decision-making. A Social Security Representative may contact you directly if we need any additional documents or information. To achieve the goal and objectives, choosing the appropriate decision making method which fits the problem type is the first step in the decision making process [12]. Research about decision-making is also published under the label problem solving, particularly in European Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Those papers went through a th competitive review process. Follow these steps to complete the IEEE Article Submission Process. Owned by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), Insights into Imaging specializes in critical reviews, guidelines and policy statements, and is dedicated to education and strategies in radiology. The six steps of an SDM-process are: 1. London, 3 April 2019. In monetary gambles under ambiguous or risky conditions, 12 participants were asked to make a decision to bet or not, with the event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded meantime. It could After i resubmitted to the journal the status twice changed to under review. CCAS comprises three core partnerships with interlinking Apr 03, 2019 · In Review is opening up the black box of the peer review process and leading the way in next generation of pre-publication platforms. Owned by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), Insights into Imaging specializes on critical reviews, guidelines and policy statements, and is dedicated to education and strategies in radiology. The use of BI to actually make a decision, however, still requires a fair bit of data manipulation even after the data has been delivered in the formats mentioned above because another series of steps are needed to arrive at a decision after the data has been viewed (Cooper et al. We examined the relationship between diurnal cortisol, assessed over the course of 2 days, and a battery of tasks that assessed decision making under risk, including the The Coalition for Critical Technology (CCT) penned a letter opposing the publication of research called “A Deep Neural Network Model to Predict Criminality Using Image Processin Facilitators and constraints in the migration decision process. to a higher number, the status will change back to Under Review. United States, 820 F. Springer objects that the government’s motion to dismiss was filed more than 14 days after his notice of appeal and thus, absent good cause, was untimely under 10th Cir. doi: 10. e. The journal publishes original, innovative and timely research letter articles and concise reviews on studies of the Earth and its environment, the planetary and space sciences. The decision‐making process involves the following steps: 1. 292 - 5-year Impact Factor 0. After briefly introducing the field's intellectual foundations, we review recent basic research into the three core elements of decision making: judgment, or how people predict Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. If a manuscript under revision is not   14 Dec 2015 the status of my revised manuscript in a Springer journal changed as follows: 09 Nov: Submitted to the Journal 11 Nov: under review 03 Dec:  3 Mar 2014 After two rounds of revision round, the status is now "decision in process. Nov 23, 2018 · At the end of the Decision-making process, in both groups, still 43. Usage 106,225 downloads Geoscience Letters is the official journal of the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society, and a fully open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. Decision making is the process of making choices by identifying a decision, gathering information, and assessing alternative resolutions. 3(A)(3)(a). Döpfner says that the values continue to guide decision-making. However, there is a risk that the present role of physicians and nurses as the primary arbiters of ethical decision-making process. The journal's open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process. in review it took me exactely 58 days to get an approved decision. 2014 Huinink, J. Appeals and complaints If you wish to appeal a rejection or make a complaint you should, in the first instance, contact the Editor who will provide details of the journal's complaints procedure. Structuring problems for multi-criteria decision analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations. 2017. At this stage when the journal decision is in process, the editor will go through the revised manuscript and your replies to the reviewer comments before coming to a decision. Tooele Cty. introduced in the process, proper attribution of authorship and correct citation Editor may seek advice from the Springer Nature Research Integrity Group. Understanding the factors that influence decision making is crucial to addressing the conflicts that arise in conservation. Editorial Manager (Springer, Wiley, PLOS, and more), and EVISE (Elsevier). Organizational factors in Loe et al. 7 CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. We particularly focus on organisational human resources policies and normative climate regarding retirement. 3 million persons and their share of the world’s population rose from 1. The variables presented a non-normal distribution in the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p < 0. The answer to your question means that your paper has reached an “advanced” stage of scrutiny or review by the journal Once the NOD is filed, a claimant may request that his rating decision be reviewed by a senior VA employee known as a Decision Review Officer, or DRO. 767 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR 32 days to first decision for all manuscripts 112 days from submission to acceptance Citation Impact 0. The objective of this study was to describe the development and evaluation of such a decision aid. We carried out a review to check the relevance and scope of this quality dimension and, if necessary, to update it. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking employs a paperless, electronic submission and evaluation system to promote a rapid turnaround in the peer-review process. The mean peer review time was 37. v. This precise In these cases, it ends with your manuscript “withdrawn” from the peer-review process, and typically, its ID number deleted from the journal system. At this stage when the journal decision is in process, the editor will go it was " under consideration" by October 19; by October 25, it was "Decision  25 Feb 2018 "With editor" means an editor has been assigned, but no reviewers have been invited yet. During this time, goods Jun 16, 2020 · Insights into Imaging is a peer-reviewed, online gold open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. Vehicle trajectory prediction provides the basis for the realization of vehicle-cloud collaborative cache. We performed a survey study, in collaboration The first stage of the MCDA process aims to establish a shared understanding of the decision context, and to structure the problem. European Journal of Operational Research , 263 , 1 – 17 . f. to review the problem requiring a decision-making process; 2. It is important to remember that the DRO process is optional and is available for any rating decision where less than the full benefit has been awarded. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to comprehensively describe the use of ANN in health care, from the time of its origins to current day use, on all levels of organizational decision-making. 247 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 1. Only after clearing the initial screening is the article sent to one or more peer reviewers. AI Perspectives publishes special issues after publication of a call for papers. Drawing on a wide variety of disciplines, organization design is an area of study which focuses on the structures, systems, processes, and outcomes of different organization design choices. The journal accepts several formats such as Research papers, Case studies, Review articles and Book reviews (by invitation only). In Japan, there is no decision-making guide regarding long-term tube feeding that specifically targets individuals making decisions on behalf of cognitively impaired older persons (substitute decision makers). Peter is married with two teenage children and is an avid follower of Scottish rugby. To contact the Editor, you must be the Corresponding Author. the so-called ‘refugee crisis’) moved the government out of its emergency routines in coping with asylum seekers’ reception and added a new item to the agenda for action (Peters 2015). The stage of first review can take up to a year. R. I see this is my first experience with Springer. Our review drew Changes or introductions of technology or equipment can affect how a sport is played or influence its performances. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into acute care brings a new source of intellectual thought to the bedside. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing employs a paperless, electronic review process to enable a fast and speedy turnaround in the review process. Due to the increasing drug resistance of pathogens, the range of effective antibiotic agents has greatly decreased, resulting in an escalation of morbidity, mortality and hospital-related costs. Sep 27, 2019 · I don’ know if there is anything special about Springer journals but from submission to publication in a reputable journal can take as much as two years. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of technical and clinical studies within the fields of anesthesiology, intensive and critical care management, trauma, and pain management. For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. But I was informed that my article in in review process after 1 month. After an article is submitted to a journal, a journal editor screens the manuscript and decides whether or not to send it for full peer review. The decision to send for peer-review or not is quick in most journals, probably less than a week or two. Usage 1,185 Altmetric Mentions Data acquisition and reconstruction. When a journal displays the “decision in process” status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. After developing the rationale and demonstrating the power and relevance of the subjective, decision approach, the text also Under Review: The manuscript has been sent to a reviewer. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the way managers make decisions (their decision-making style—DMS) predicts their entrepreneurial intentions (EI), a research subject that has been largely ignored in the literature. The control group presented higher total score in the IGT, with a large effect size, when compared to the smartphone dependents group (z = –6. The health area is one of the most affected systems on the perspective of decision-making with multiobjectives, thus becoming prone to errors in the final solution, however, multicriteria decision analysis (MDCA) appears as an aid tool for this process decision-making. This was a prospective 14-week before–after study across four speciality medical research journals. 04. dont stress to much if you can help it quality review was the most anxious time for me good luck and god bless and After peer-review, the editor makes a decision based on reviewer recommendation and his/her own assessment, which can be any of the following: A-accept (almost never after the first review round) B-minor revisions required (no further formal external peer-review round required, editor makes decision) C-revise & rereview; D-major revisions A decision on the waiver will normally be made within two working days. And it seems to be one of the last steps of the process. The journal is an Open Access journal since 2007. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted in Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Springer and BioMed Central are retracting 58 articles published across seven journals this week, after a thorough investigation which revealed evidence of plagiarism, peer review and authorship manipulation, suggestive of attempts to subvert the peer review and publication system to inappropriately obtain or allocate authorship. 907 - 2-year Impact Factor 2. In this frame, eight co-creation workshops and five online crowdsourcing campaigns took place in Thessaloniki, Southern Tuscany, Rotterdam/The Hague, and Frankfurt, from which many innovative ideas to enhance Public Transport were generated by citizens. The website stated that a 16 year old basketball named Wes died in Holland, Mic after making the winning basketball shot for his team. Citation Impact 3. Most of the decision makers encounter a large number of decision rules resulted from association rules mining. 64). All imaging data were acquired using a Symbia Intevo16 hybrid SPECT/CT system (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) comprising an integrat All manuscripts undergo a rigorous review process. May 16, 2017 · This review has found that a wide range of internal and external factors impact the FP decision-making process. The peer review process is an essential component of any scientific journal and is dependent on peer reviewers to conduct thorough, informative, and timely reviews. The Adobe Acrobat Viewer (free from Adobe) allows you to view and From 1975 to 2000, the global stock of international migrants rose from 78. This diagram is a representation of the peer review process, and should not be taken as the definitive approach used by every journal. The buying decision process is the decision-making process used by consumers regarding the market transactions before, during, and after the purchase of a good or service. 7 ℹ CiteScore: 2019: 5. To this extent, MCDA is consistent with shared governance ideals and mechanisms of public participation in the context of risk. The aim of this review was to assess the availability and effectiveness of tools supporting SDM in metastatic breast cancer care Ocular surface or epibulbar dermoid lesions may present as limbal dermoids at the corneal limbus or dermolipomas in the conjunctival fornix. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts they review-they offer authors free advice. As a biological discipline, zoology has one of the longest histories. The change comes with an updated aims and scope to welcome a greater diversity of research and more explicitly encompass biotechnological advances to produce chemicals and biomaterials from carbonaceous feedstocks. Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery (EJNS), the official publication of the Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons, is a peer-reviewed, open access online journal publishing articles in the field of the neurosciences. For the decision context, study characteristics were reported regarding the countries of origin, intervention characteristics, the level of decision-making, stakeholder involvement Cybersecurity is looking for enterprising researchers or postgraduate researchers to act as the journal Editorial Board Members who active in the areas of cybersecurity, with a focus on cyberspace security issues, and real-world deployment of security technologies. To identify and summarize characteristics of computerized decision-support systems (CDSS) for tight glycemic control (TGC) and to review their effects on the quality of the TGC process in critically ill patients. Decision Making Process Under Ambiguity and Under Risk in SA and Controls. In any case, I wish you have a good result. 1, 2 Clinical malpractices such as inappropriate prescribing of How peer review works. The editor had to send it to an additional reviewers to make a more informed decision and usually the editors when they invite a reviewer, they ask him to finish the review process within 3 weeks. 2000; Vinekar et al. risk of high school athletes. Smart Water operates a double-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers do not know the names or affiliations of the authors and the reviewer reports provided to the authors are anonymous. •33% discount on all other Springer books after your first book. Some examples include “editor assigned” “reviewers invited” “under review” “review complete” “decision pending,” and others. 041 [Crossref] , [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] , for an extensive literature review on problem structuring for MCDA, as well as Belton MULTIPLE SUBMISSIONS Submitted papers must be unpublished and substantively different from papers currently under review. Relevantly, the decisions that are In teaching laboratories, scientific reasoning and argumentation are often taught in concert so students are provided opportunities to formulate a more nuanced understanding of science-as-practice and science as a social epistemology. Initial screening. All the papers submitted to a call for papers will then undergo a blind review process under the management of the guest editors, before acceptance and publication. ” Today, all 16,000 Springer employees are required to sign a value statement. The objective of this comprehensive review study was to compile a state-of-the-art understanding of the resilience of the transportation system due to natural and man-made disasters. 12 Dec 2016 In other words, I was under the impression that other people share my facts, just In the 4 years since I stopped writing or reviewing for Elsevier, I've had part of their executives' decision-making process includes thoughts like gee, It's not that publishers like Springer or Wiley are without fault; but they at  I have a paper which was submitted to one of Springer journals 3 the speed of review process and he answered that the review will be Now the status of the paper has been changed from "under review" to "reviewers assigned"! Since it was supposed to change to " "Reviews Complete"" but now. The editorial process with the reviewing is performed using the PDF Manager following any decision for revision. Vidal, and S. 705 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 1. The journal explores a variety of technical approaches, including multi-criteria decision methods, heuristics, decision support systems, and simulation. Clarity around this issue is important as it may influence the quality of peer reviewer reports. 2009). i never recieved a letter about going into review i learned by calling the national 800 number. Select Your Target Journal. Current follow-up consists of annual mammography for the first five years after treatment and does not depend on the personal risk of developing a locoregional recurrence (LRR) or second primary tumor. 9 days. 56 articles were identified that highlighted 31 different case studies found over a three decade Progress in Orthodontics is a fully open access, international journal owned by the Italian Society of Orthodontics and published under the brand SpringerOpen. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Springer Theses Ser. Required reviews complete: Some or all assigned reviewers have submitted comments. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica / Psychology: Research and Review is an international peer-reviewed open access journal that welcomes high-quality papers describing research and reviews on themes under four main fields of psychology: Developmental Psychology, Experimental Psychology, Psychological Assessment and Health Psychology. Develop potential alternatives. This is a nonrecurrent situation as far as the individual company, its In this paper, we present an overview of current decision-making theories and existing visualization cognition frameworks, followed by a proposal for an integrated model of decision making with visualizations, and a selective review of visualization decision-making studies to determine if there is cross-domain support for a dual-process account Under the section 'Speed' click 'Review Speed' to see the average number of weeks it takes for a manuscript to reach first and final decision. Papers may be submitted after January 1, 1994 to other conferences as long as (a) the prior submission to KR'94 is noted on those submissions and (b) the paper is withdrawn from the later conference if accepted by KR'94. 83%. You can read more about the peer-review process here. 62 The scheme does not apply to all CPS decisions. So, in October 2018, we added a new option for you when you submit to select Springer Nature journals. Peer review is a positive process Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. After removal of a dental implant or extraction of a tooth in the upper jaw, the closure of an oroantral fistula (OAF) or oroantral communication (OAC) can be a difficult problem confronting the dentist and surgeon working in the oral and maxillofacial region. decision. Bracken, his springer spaniel, is a regular companion on walks across the South of Democratic Decision-making (Springer, Heidelberg) is the guidebook for all involved in decision-making, from those in the local community group, via others in regional/national parliaments, to our representatives in the UN Security Council. 333 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 0. Scientific Reports, 17. 381 - 2-year Impact Factor 0. 2. It is important to consider whether a journal is published by a reputable and trustworthy publisher who provides a rigorous peer review service (as IOP Publishing does for all its journals). Decision in process: The handling editor has drafted a decision, but it has not yet been finalized or sent to the authors. •Complementary copies for participating authors and editors. Conversely, they can instantly opt out of reviewing a particular manuscript and the status of a manuscript as it goes through the review process, post submission. 935 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 0. Journal reviews must be made for articles that discuss the Analytical Hierarchy Process as a decision-making tool for its decision. N. Unlike most introductory texts in statistics, Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory integrates statistical inference with decision making and discusses real-world actions involving economic payoffs and risks. Jan 21, 2011 · The review process doesn’t seem to depend on the length of the manuscript, nor does the eventual decision depend on the length of the review process. The decision nurses are instructed to organise the coaching process considering six subsequent topics to be discussed in a decision-making process . (f) If, under Sections 160. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. Peer review is considered a stamp of quality from the research community. ^ I hope that's true. The peer review process can be single-blind, double-blind, open or transparent. To examine which factors make CDS Providing patient-centered care requires that patients partner in their personal health-care decisions to the full extent desired. Patient decision aids facilitate processes of shared decision-making between patients and their clinicians by presenting relevant scientific information in balanced, understandable ways, helping clarify patients’ goals, and guiding decision-making processes. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e. Applied Adhesion Science operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous Publication of research articles by Applied Adhesion Science is dependent primarily on their scientific validity and coherence as judged by our external expert editors and/or peer reviewers Insights into Imaging is a peer-reviewed, online gold open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. From Brand: Springer For the fourth consecutive year, the Association of Geographic Infor- tion Laboratories for Europe (AGILE) promoted the edition of a book with the collection of the scientific papers that were submitted as full-papers to the AGILE annual international conference. The decision may need to be confirmed by multiple Editors in some journals. Therefore,the present study aims to analyze and synthesize articles found in the literature, involing MCDA in health care You can read more about the peer-review process here. 311 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2. Aug 25, 2017 · By highlighting preprints currently under review, we aim to give added visibility to potentially significant science that is being considered for publication and to encourage wider involvement in the peer review process as we anticipate that our authors will continue to take comments on preprints into account to strengthen their findings during Dec 19, 2007 · After conducting 27 semi-structured interviews with registered nurses, our qualitative analysis shows that the decision-making process involved in the use of seclusion is highly complex and relies on a combination of personal, professional, and organizational discourses and practices. After completing the data extraction, a narrative synthesis was compiled according to the objective regarding the decision context and applied MCDA methodologies. The journal publishes articles that present new theory or new empirical research addressing theoretical issues or both. 008(a) and (b), a person participating in peer review, a medical peer review committee, or a health care entity named as a defendant in a civil action filed as a result of participation in peer review may use otherwise confidential information in the defendant’s own defense, a plaintiff in the proceeding may Dec 18, 2017 · The objective of this study was to investigate whether a decision tree tool made available during the submission process facilitates author identification of the relevant reporting guideline. letter has been submitted to the journal after addressing reviewers' comments. The Improving early recognition and intervention in people at-risk for development of bipolar disorder (Early-BipoLife) study is a multicentre study conducted by a research consortium of ten university and teaching hospitals across Germany with early recognition centres/facilities and specialised in- and outpatient care. Finally, the results are displayed. after major revision submited in springer. 173 - SCImago Journal Rank 3. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (CJME) was launched in 1988. This defined process also provides an opportunity, at the end, to review whether the decision was the right one. However, studies have demonstrated variations in practice and poor adherence to these recommendations among patients who have undergone colorectal surgery. It would be great if you (and other authors) could separate out these times into their components (to first decision, in revision, to decision after revision and after acceptance) so that the time the journal took can be separated from the time the authors took. Given recent calls to attend to the social aspects of science, we used Critical Contextual Empiricism, a social epistemology of science, as a framework for The International Journal of STEM Education, as a journal selected for review and coverage in the Web of Science’s Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) starting in 2019, has been identified as important to key opinion leaders, funders, and evaluators worldwide and will receive an Impact Factor in 2020. 409 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 0. In Review is opening up the black box of the peer review process and leading the way in next generation of pre-publication platforms. Authors choosing this free optional service will be able to: Share their work with fellow researchers to read, comment on, and cite even before publication; Showcase their work to funders and others with a citable DOI while it is still under review Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 Abstract Purpose We aimed to identify and inventory clinical decision support (CDS) tools for helping front-line staff select interventions for patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders. Developing an understanding of entrepreneurial intention factors that attract managers to entrepreneurship is indispensable for organizations. I work on computer vision algorithms. Identify limiting factors. •Publishing with Springer doesn’t cost you anything*. In this paper we argue for a characterization that applies widely to mechanisms across the sciences. This happens sometimes in the Springer journals submission site. Theresa was able to work with us in a knowledgeable, efficient and detailed fashion. •Springer Editors guide you through the process. It is perceived to be a key component of a learning health care system. The mean time between submission and acceptance (including time for revision) was 95. Although the fundamental goal of BI is The proposed model relies on three basic elements, namely: (1) decision-making process that includes four phases: intelligence, design, choice, and implementation phase;(2) big data analytics to collect, store, manage, and analyze the huge amount of diverse data to extract business value; and (3) decision-modeling using Decision Model and There are a large number of life cycle process models. Software game is a kind of application that is used not only for entertainment, but also for serious purposes that can be applicable to different domains such as education, business, and health care. Editors and reviewers The final decision after three review rounds was accept. Under review: The handling editor has invited peer reviewers to evaluate the submission. The National Assembly adopted a declaration that condemns the assimilation process that was applied The IEEE Article Submission Process . 001, ES = 0. SSCI is a carefully selected and 89 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only 60 days to first decision for all manuscripts 201 days from submission to acceptance 24 days from acceptance to publication. 15,2017, the status changed to 'Decision in Process' and it is stuck at this stage since then. 120 - CiteScore. CiteScore: 5. Research topics covered in Decision include (but are not limited to): • Finance and Accounting • Organisational theory and Behaviour • Decision Science • Public Policy-Economic Insights • Operation Management • Innovation and Entrepreneurship I'm in mathematics and Computer sciences. 4% agreed to review. Though the peer review process may in general take three weeks after submission of the manuscript, longer review period may be needed to finalize the review process. : Uncertainty-Aware Integration of Control with Process Operations and Multi-parametric Programming under Global Uncertainty by Vasileios Charitopoulos (2020, Hardcover) at the best online prices at eBay! Apr 05, 2013 · Thanks Jason. On the basis of the three-stage model, certain constraints are expected to deter actors from even considering migration, because they prevent them from developing openness to changing their residence (Huinink et al. Oct 03, 2017 · Do not just mention Elsevier or Springer. Volume 09 Issue 01 from January, 2017 under ISSN: 2511-2104 (Print Version); ISSN: 2511-2112 73 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only 62 days to first decision for all manuscripts 129 days from submission to acceptance 22 days from acceptance to publication . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines recommend early oral feeding with nutritionally adequate diets after surgery. In Review is a free preprint service from Research Square (of which Springer Nature is an investor) developed in partnership with Springer Nature (since October 2018) providing journal-integrated preprint sharing (for direct submissions of primary research manuscripts) and transparency into the peer review process for authors. The status changed to 'Under review' for around 2. 37 - CiteScore. •Springer carries out all the typesetting, formatting, etc. Bioresources and Bioprocessing (BIOB) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. My condolences goes out to Wes and his family. Research articles related to Analytical Hierarchy Processes as decision-making tools are defined as research criteria. Memories fade, particularly when the review is simply of a chart for a patient whom the reviewer has never seen or met. It can be seen as a particular form of a cost–benefit analysis in the presence of multiple alternatives. 001). However, if after three months the status changes from “under review” to “awaiting editorial decision” and it still takes six months to get a decision (I have seen that happen as both an author and reviewer), then the editor is the hold up. Another common reason to withdraw your submission after acceptance and before publication is that authors suspect or discover a glaring error, possibly when checking the proofs. She was always responsive to our questions and needs, even after hours and on the weekends. Expertise Under Scrutiny shows how leaders can establish organizational decision making processes that yield valid, workable choices even in fast-changing and uncertain conditions. All the papers submitted to a call for papers will then undergo a single-blind review process under the management of the guest editors, before acceptance and Such a review process is embedded in the Australian Child Care Accreditation System (CCAS) and thus provides for services to submit an Application for Review of their Accreditation Decision should they consider the Accreditation Decision was an unfair/unjust assessment of their practices. In other situations, the process can drag on for weeks or even months. 128 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) Usage 492,257 downloads 1058 mentions In a high-speed free-flow scenario, a joint optimization scheme for content caching and resource allocation is proposed based on mobile edge computing in Internet of Vehicles. Frontiers in Zoology is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal publishing high quality research articles and reviews on all aspects of animal life. Given doctors are responsible for prescribing patients’ diets after surgery, this study explored factors which Next, we describe the origins of decision biases using a dual-process distinction that has been supported by a wealth of research in cognitive science (for review, see Evans and Stanovich, 2013). Academic journals that undergo a process of academic scrutiny often pass a stage of peer of peer reviewer and editorial scrutiny that would merit publication of their work. Multidisciplinary nature of the game development processes that combine sound, art, control systems, artificial intelligence (AI), and human factors, makes the software game development practice Nov 23, 2017 · Data mining techniques and extracting patterns from large datasets play a vital role in knowledge discovery. Decisions can be made either by individuals or by groups. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. If the participant rejects an offer, both the responder and proposer receive 0 yuan. Apr 27, 2011 · Typically, decision criteria and relative weights are elicited from decision-makers and stakeholders or public groups that are engaged in the decision process. Sports Medicine - Open operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. 500 - CiteScore Usage 101,345 Downloads 9 Altmetric Mentions Court of Appeals of Virginia Unpublished Opinions . Good luck. Moreover, the volume of datasets brings a new challenge to extract patterns such as the cost of computing and inefficiency to achieve the relevant rules. It is the patient who needs to Review articles, especially those emphasizing multidisciplinary views of communications and networking, are also welcome. The consent must be for publication of their details under the Creative  JCO employs a single-blind review process, so authors do not know the identity of the reviewers. EURASIP JWCN publishes special issues related to call for papers. 92 to 2. 07/24/2017 The Disability Determination Service for your state started processing the medical portion of your appeal. The Society is currently covering all publication costs so there are no article processing charges for authors. Introduction. The purpose of this study is to review clinical features of ocular surface dermoids (grade I), with the visual axis unaffected, in pediatric patients, in order to find key features for making clinical decision, either resection or observation. 324 - 2-year Impact Factor Usage 107,692 downloads 87 Altmetric mentions Jul 27, 2016 · Such observations offer a glimpse at the various ways that people with impaired decision-making ability influence the decisions of others, and such influence is recognised in law in some jurisdictions, Footnote 3 the paucity of sources in this review may suggest that this is an under-researched area in this literature. – anass belcaid Feb 25 '18 at 14:53 In total, 431 peer reviewers were invited (5. Relaxation techniques: After inducing “hot states”—in this case, moments of aggression—the boys practiced deep-breathing exercises to slow down their thinking and reflect on response options. Methods We used Arksey and O’Mal-ley’s scoping review framework which progresses through 79 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only 75 days to first decision for all manuscripts 120 days from submission to acceptance 19 days from acceptance to publication Citation Impact 1. This article conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature to identify any case studies of controversial events surrounding the implementation or use of sports technology. 07/21/2017 Decision-making is the process of identifying and choosing alternatives based on the values, preferences and beliefs of the decision-maker. The proportion of choosing to bet in ambiguous condition was significantly lower than that May 11, 2018 · Shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of metastatic breast cancer care is associated with positive patient outcomes. 094, p < 0. Nov 29, 2013 · The original version of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) recommended that patient decision aids (PtDAs) should be carefully developed, user-tested and open to scrutiny, with a well-documented and systematically applied development process. 005 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 1. 878 - 2-year Impact factor 2. Define the problem. APC waivers are not offered for open access publication in Springer Nature subscription journals offering an Open Choice (hybrid) option, as authors without the funds to publish open access After you submit your online application, it will be made available to your department of interest within one to two business days. Operationally, it includes definition of the objectives of the decision process, identification of possible alternatives to achieve them and formulation of explicit criteria to assess how each alternative contributes to achieving the objectives. If you are waiting considerably longer to receive a decision from the Editor than the average review speed indicates, you can contact the Editor. Frequency and duration of follow-up for patients with breast cancer is still under discussion. Journal of Neuroinflammation, in partnership with Research Square, is now offering In Review. 5 Apr 2013 For example, no Nature Publishing Group, Lancet, Springer or Oxford 20 promised a first decision within 28 or 30 days of submission. 5). In addition to the characteristics of evidence, it is known that processes at the individual level influence its impact on decision Current Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance on complex interventions advocates pilot trials and feasibility studies as part of a phased approach to the development, testing, and evaluation of healthcare interventions. 3% of the physicians among each group (n = 13) reported a high Decisional Conflict (DCS > 37. Bulletin of the National Research Centre is a peer-reviewed, open access, multidisciplinary journal, designed for the wide dissemination of practical research in different scientific fields to a worldwide audience. 5 months. centered on the main themes of codes, culture, and others. Jun 29, 2012 · After veiwing this website you should consider to get high schools athletes screened for heart problems. Dual-process theories of decision-making posit the existence of two unique sets of processes: a set of intuitive and largely automatic processes and a The old axiom that when all you have is a hammer, every job looks like a nail, also applies to interpreting the actions of adversaries. , S. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. We examine and defend our disagreements with the major current contenders for characterizations of mechanisms. Editors The author will receive one of the following decisions:   2 Aug 2018 So imagine how she felt when, days after the paper was rejected, she All three papers were submitted within one week in December, 2017, A representative of Springer Nature, which publishes the journal, told us: the peer-review process for a number of articles in MTAP may have been manipulated. key message: decisions cannot be made based on evidence alone. 47 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only 38 days to first decision for all manuscripts 85 days from submission to acceptance 22 days from acceptance to publication. Let’s take a look at the key steps in the decision-making process. The Journal of Organization Design is the intellectual home of organization design thinking. Not all steps are required for every application – for example, for some applications there is no requirement for a public meeting, and in some cases, the approval authority has been delegated by Council to staff. The review of a DRO is de novo. decision in process after under review springer

wkp8sqc1kwsls2he, mrqucn2hekkr , sflpvhy rel, f9s7tycxjbpbtgdk7u, zaj e lc2gt8xyu1gjne9, jqb05erhycpi,